The topic of same-sex marriage has been a subject of significant debate and social change in recent years. While many countries around the world have recognized the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals to marry, India has been grappling with the legal and societal implications of same-sex marriage.
In this article, we will explore the landmark ruling of the Supreme Court of India on same-sex marriage and delve into its impact on the LGBTQ+ community, legal considerations, public opinion, and more.
Before discussing the Supreme Court’s ruling, it is essential to understand the historical context surrounding same-sex relationships in India. Same-sex intimacy was decriminalized in 2018 when the court struck down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, a colonial-era law that criminalized consensual homosexual acts. This significant milestone marked a turning point in recognizing the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals in India.
Legal Implications of 2018 Judgement
The Supreme Court’s ruling on same-sex marriage has several legal implications. It provides same-sex couples with the same rights and privileges enjoyed by heterosexual couples, including inheritance rights, adoption rights, and access to spousal benefits. This landmark decision has paved the way for legal recognition and protection of LGBTQ+ relationships in India.
Impact on LGBTQ+ Community
The ruling has had a profound impact on the LGBTQ+ community in India. It has given same-sex couples the freedom to publicly express their love and commitment through marriage, enabling them to lead more fulfilling lives. Additionally, the recognition of same-sex marriages has boosted the self-esteem and social acceptance of LGBTQ+ individuals, challenging stereotypes and fostering inclusivity.
Public Opinion and Controversies
While the Supreme Court’s ruling received widespread support from the LGBTQ+ community and allies, it also sparked controversies and debates within Indian society. Some conservative sections raised objections, citing cultural and religious beliefs. However, public opinion has gradually shifted towards acceptance and inclusivity, with more individuals recognizing the importance of equal rights for all.
Looking beyond India, it is worth exploring international comparisons regarding same-sex marriage. Numerous countries, including Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, and several European nations, have already legalized same-sex marriage. By examining these global examples, India can draw valuable insights and learn from the experiences of other nations in implementing and regulating same-sex marriage.
The legalization of same-sex marriage has been a major victory for the LGBTQ+ community. It has helped to ensure that same-sex couples have the same legal rights and protections as heterosexual couples. Same-sex marriage has also helped to promote equality and acceptance of LGBTQ+ people.
However, there are still many countries where same-sex marriage is not legal. In some countries, same-sex couples may be arrested or even executed for engaging in same-sex sexual activity. The legalization of same-sex marriage is an ongoing struggle, but it is a struggle that is making progress.
LGBTQ+ Rights Advocacy
The Supreme Court’s ruling on same-sex marriage has energized LGBTQ+ rights advocacy in India. Activists and organizations are working tirelessly to promote awareness, provide legal support, and advocate for the full inclusion and protection of LGBTQ+ rights. This ruling has served as a catalyst for further progress and has encouraged individuals to come forward and share their stories, fostering a sense of community and solidarity.
Importance of Inclusivity
The recognition of same-sex marriage highlights the importance of inclusivity in society. It underscores the significance of embracing diversity and respecting the rights and dignity of every individual, regardless of their sexual orientation. Inclusivity creates a more harmonious and equitable society, promoting understanding, empathy, and acceptance.
Same-sex marriage pleas to be heard: Here are key updates on this landmark SC hearing:
How Bollywood Celebrities Reacted
Some celebrities have expressed hope that the court will rule in favor of same-sex marriage, while others have expressed concern that the court will uphold the current law, which does not recognize same-sex marriages.
One of the most vocal supporters of same-sex marriage in India is Bollywood actor Ayushmann Khurrana. Khurrana has spoken out about the importance of LGBTQIA+ rights on several occasions, and he has urged the Supreme Court to legalize same-sex marriage.
“Same-sex marriage is a basic human right,” Khurrana said in a recent interview. “It’s time for India to join the rest of the world and recognize the love between two people, regardless of their gender.”
Here are some of the reactions from celebrities on the Supreme Court’s decision to reserve its verdict on the legal status of same-sex marriage:
- Karan Johar: “I hope the Supreme Court makes a progressive decision and legalizes same-sex marriage in India. All couples, regardless of their sexual orientation, should have the right to marry.”
- Ayushmann Khurrana: “I believe that love is love. It should not matter who you love. I hope the Supreme Court makes a decision that is in line with the values of our Constitution.”
- Sonu Nigam: “I am a proud ally of the LGBTQIA+ community. I hope the Supreme Court makes a decision that will help to create a more equal and just society for all.”
- Kangana Ranaut: “I am not going to comment on the Supreme Court’s decision. I believe that everyone should have the right to their own opinion.”
- Virat Kohli: “I am waiting for the Supreme Court to make its decision. I will comment on the issue once I have had a chance to read the judgment.”
- Same-sex couple will raise a child with love, empathy, and inherited grace, says Varun Grover
“How will a #samesexcouple raise a child? Definitely better than how a majority of hetero couples raise theirs. These kids won’t be the product of a loveless marriage or greed for a son or pressure from elders. They will be raised with love, empathy, and inherited grace,” Varun Grover tweeted on Wednesday.
Kashmir Files famed director shared his positive view on Twitter.
Petitioner vs Respondents
The petitioners, who are members of the LGBTQIA+ community, argued that the right to marry is a fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution of India. They also argued that same-sex marriage is not against the tenets of any religion in India.
The respondents, who are the government and various state governments, argued that same-sex marriage is not recognized by any law in India. They also argued that same-sex marriage would undermine the institution of marriage and would have negative consequences for society.
The court is expected to deliver its verdict in the coming months.
Here are some of the key arguments made by the petitioners and the respondents:
- The right to marry is a fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution of India.
- Same-sex marriage is not against the tenets of any religion in India.
- Same-sex couples are just as capable of forming loving and lasting relationships as heterosexual couples.
- Denying same-sex couples the right to marry is a form of discrimination.
- Same-sex marriage is not recognized by any law in India.
- Same-sex marriage would undermine the institution of marriage.
- Same-sex marriage would have negative consequences for society, such as increased rates of divorce and single-parent households.
The Supreme Court will have to weigh the arguments made by both sides before making a decision. It is a complex issue with no easy answers. However, the court’s decision will have a significant impact on the lives of LGBTQIA+ people in India.
Some Interesting Arguments In This Case
- ‘My client is a transgender person, for her to be branded as ‘urban elitist’ shows a lack of grace,’ says Vishwanathan
Senior Advocate KV Vishwanathan, “My client is transgender, was disowned by the family, begged on the streets, and today she is a director in KPMG- all by herself. For her to be branded an “urban elitist” shows an absolute lack of grace,”
- ‘Notion of man, a woman not based on genitals,’ says SC on legal validation of same-sex marriage
The five-judge constitution bench headed by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud that they would not consider personal marriage laws while deciding the case. However, lawyers were asked to present arguments on the Special Marriage Act
- ‘When you deny me the right of marriage, you deny me citizenship’ Mukul Rohatgi
Mukul Rohatgi said, “When you deny me the right of marriage, you deny me citizenship. If you deny me citizenship, you are saying you’re no good, you’re not equal to a citizen under preamble so you stay where you are,”
Indian Lawyer, Kapil Sibal asked a tough question about acceptance.
The Supreme Court of India’s ruling on same-sex marriage represents a landmark moment in the fight for LGBTQ+ rights. It signifies a significant step towards equality and inclusivity in the country. The decision has legal implications, impacts the LGBTQ+ community, triggers public opinion, and raises important legislative considerations.
As India navigates the path toward full equality, it is crucial to continue advocating for the rights of the LGBTQ+ community and fostering a society that celebrates diversity and embraces love in all its forms.
- Is same-sex marriage legal in India?
The case is still in the Supreme Court of India and a suitable judgment is expected soon.
- What is the 2018 Supreme Court’s LGBTQ judgment about?
Union of India thr. Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice (2018) is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that decriminalized all consensual sex among adults, including homosexual sex. The Court decriminalized all consensual sex among adults, including homosexual sex.
- What is the status of LGBTQ, internationally?
Numerous countries, including Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, and several European nations, have already legalized same-sex marriage. There are still many countries where same-sex marriage is not legal. In some countries, same-sex couples may be arrested or even executed for engaging in same-sex sexual activity